<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL Draft HD Coverage on ESPN (sort of)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nfl-draft-hd-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nfl-draft-hd-coverage/</link>
	<description>If it is not in high definition, it is not in this guide!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 05:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nfl-draft-hd-coverage/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nfl-draft-hd-coverage/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>If I had to choose between HD shots of the analysts covering the draft and an SD picture wrapped in stats and other news... hands down I choose the SD picture with the stats.  However, I still wish I could have both (HD picture with the extra stats and info wrapped around the edges).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to choose between HD shots of the analysts covering the draft and an SD picture wrapped in stats and other news&#8230; hands down I choose the SD picture with the stats.  However, I still wish I could have both (HD picture with the extra stats and info wrapped around the edges).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
