<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History of the NFL in High Definition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nfl-high-definition-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nfl-high-definition-history/</link>
	<description>If it is not in high definition, it is not in this guide!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:50:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lekter</title>
		<link>http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nfl-high-definition-history/comment-page-1/#comment-17271</link>
		<dc:creator>Lekter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdsportsguide.com/?p=630#comment-17271</guid>
		<description>David you probably have Comcast or Time Warner/Brighthouse (they&#039;re known for compressing the fuk out of their HD channels) because to me CBS provides the best HD. I have Verizon FiOS.  Fox&#039;s HD is a joke and NBC has their HD compressed as demonstrated by the pixelation when there is fast camera movement. You should try Verizon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David you probably have Comcast or Time Warner/Brighthouse (they&#8217;re known for compressing the fuk out of their HD channels) because to me CBS provides the best HD. I have Verizon FiOS.  Fox&#8217;s HD is a joke and NBC has their HD compressed as demonstrated by the pixelation when there is fast camera movement. You should try Verizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rank</title>
		<link>http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nfl-high-definition-history/comment-page-1/#comment-12725</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdsportsguide.com/?p=630#comment-12725</guid>
		<description>Recent playoff games in HD demonstrate that CBS has an over compressed signal much inferior to either FOX or NBC. (CBS has very noticable pixelization noise.) I would hope that the CBS feed of the superbowl would be of higher quality.

I think your fans should expect real HD for the superbowl and that the NFL could appy some pressure to the CBS network to put out a high quality HD signal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent playoff games in HD demonstrate that CBS has an over compressed signal much inferior to either FOX or NBC. (CBS has very noticable pixelization noise.) I would hope that the CBS feed of the superbowl would be of higher quality.</p>
<p>I think your fans should expect real HD for the superbowl and that the NFL could appy some pressure to the CBS network to put out a high quality HD signal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nfl-high-definition-history/comment-page-1/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdsportsguide.com/?p=630#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>still wish that the NFL Network would produce their shows in HD.  For gosh sakes, you have had an NFLN-HD channel for a long time and you utilize it every few months for something, but it rarely gets the treatment it deserves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still wish that the NFL Network would produce their shows in HD.  For gosh sakes, you have had an NFLN-HD channel for a long time and you utilize it every few months for something, but it rarely gets the treatment it deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

